Electric Motors

Introduction

There are 5 types of motors that we will discuss,

  1. [[#AC 3 Phase Induction motor]]
  2. [[#BLDC Motor]]
  3. [[#Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PMSM)]]
  4. [[#Synchronous Reluctance Motor (SynRM)]]
  5. [[#Switched Reluctance Motor (SRM)]]

AC 3 Phase Induction motor

Video

F = qE + qv × B

DC Motor

Video

Click or Scan QR Code to view video on Brushless DC Motor

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWulQ1ZSE3c

BLDC Motor

Video

Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PMSM)

Video

DC Winding Rotor Self- Starting

PMSM Starting

Synchronous Reluctance Motor (SynRM)

Info

Switched Reluctance Motor (SRM)

Video

Variable Frequency Drive (VFD)

Formula

Ns = 120fP

Where,
Ns = Synchronous Speed
f = Frequency of AC excitation in Hertz(Hz)
P = No. of poles on stator

Reluctance

TeacherWorkshopMakeaMagneticField-ezgif.com-optimize.gif

images.png

Conclusion

Motor Comparisons

Motor Type Efficiency @ Constant RPM Current Rise w/ Torque (Constant RPM) Current Rise w/ Torque (Top Speed) Cost Flux Density Torque Density Control Complexity Key Pros Key Cons Example in India
PMSM (Interior or Surface) ⭐⭐⭐⭐ High Linear Exponential 💰💰💰 (High – Rare earth magnets) ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (High – due to magnets) ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excellent) ⭐⭐⭐ (Needs FOC + rotor position sensor) High efficiency, great torque, compact Costly, magnets degrade at high temps Tata Nexon EV, MG ZS EV
BLDC (Trapezoidal) ⭐⭐⭐ Moderate–High Step-wise Steep rise 💰💰 (Moderate) ⭐⭐⭐ (Good) ⭐⭐⭐ (Good) ⭐ (Simple, Hall-based) Cost-effective, good for light EVs Torque ripple, less smooth Ather 450X, Ola S1
IM (AC Induction) ⭐⭐ Medium Non-linear (slip dependent) Gradual rise 💰 (Low – No magnets) ⭐⭐ (Moderate, field-oriented) ⭐⭐ (Low–Medium) ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Well-known control) Rugged, cheap, no magnets Less efficient, heavier Mahindra eVerito, older Tesla models
SRM (Switched Reluctance) ⭐⭐ Medium Abrupt/Non-linear Very steep 💰 (Very Low) ⭐⭐ (Depends on design) ⭐ (Low) ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Highly complex, high-frequency control) Simple construction, no magnets Noisy, torque ripple, EMI issues Prototype/R&D, commercial 3W
SynRM (Synchronous Reluctance) ⭐⭐⭐ High Smooth, mild non-linear Steep 💰💰 (No magnets, but needs special rotor design) ⭐⭐ (Moderate) ⭐⭐ (Less than PMSM) ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (FOC + rotor position estimation) Magnet-free, efficient Lower peak torque, still emerging Hyundai R&D, future EU/India tech

Legend:

EV Motor Type Comparison Table

Parameter Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PMSM) Switched Reluctance Motor (SRM) Synchronous Reluctance Motor (SynRM) Brushless DC Motor (BLDC) AC Induction Motor (IM)
Operating Principle Uses permanent magnets on the rotor and synchronized stator field Uses rotor saliency and reluctance torque with switched windings Uses rotor saliency to generate reluctance torque Uses permanent magnets with trapezoidal commutation Uses electromagnetic induction with squirrel cage or wound rotor
Efficiency Very high ~95% Moderate (85–90%) High ~90%) High ~90%) Moderate ~85%)
Torque Density High Moderate Moderate High Moderate
Peak Power Density High Moderate Moderate High Moderate
Cost Expensive due to rare earth magnets Lower due to absence of rare earth materials Lower than PMSM due to no magnets Moderate Low (due to mature technology)
Reliability & Durability High, but risk of demagnetization Very high, robust structure High, but lower thermal limits High, but requires precise control Very high, proven technology
Consumption at a Given RPM Lowest, due to high efficiency and constant field Higher due to hysteresis and switching losses Moderate, depends on design optimization Lower at low to mid-speed but can increase at high RPM Higher due to slip losses
Current vs Torque at Increasing Speed Linear increase, as field weakening compensates Nonlinear, higher current draw at low speeds Linear but with saturation effects at high speeds Linear increase but efficiency decreases at high RPM Exponential at high speeds due to slip increase
Current vs Torque at Top Speed Exponential increase due to field weakening losses Exponential increase due to switching inefficiencies Moderate increase due to reluctance losses Exponential increase due to back EMF effects Highest increase due to slip and heat losses